<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JLCoady.net &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jlcoady.net/tag/microsoft/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jlcoady.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:15:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is Microsoft Vista Dead?</title>
		<link>http://jlcoady.net/windows/microsoft-vista-dead</link>
		<comments>http://jlcoady.net/windows/microsoft-vista-dead#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jlcoady.net/?p=68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is according to a recent article entitled CNN &#8211; is Microsoft Vista dead?
But that makes the assumption that just because Microsoft is replacing Vista, Vista is dead/abandoned and, because it is being replaced, it is an inferior product. Or maybe they are thinking that because Vista is so new and is already being replaced [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://jlcoady.net/windows/microsoft-vista-dead/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
